>>18085217
>put us in power and let us do whatever we want because Capitalism bad
It’s not about arbitrary power but the proletariat seizing the means of production to abolish class exploitation. Capitalism’s crises stem from its anarchic profit motive, which socialism replaces with planned production for social needs.
>Communism was just a way to move people around wherever you wanted and imprison pesky intellectuals and land owners so they could modernize thier economy and put people in factories
Nice distortion of history. Socialist revolutions dismantled feudal remnants and bourgeois property relations not to "move people around," but to collectivize production and end exploitation. Intellectuals and landowners faced suppression only when they actively opposed the revolution, and industrialization under socialism built economies for the masses, not private profit.
>I make bullets and I love it because I own this factory, my profits are bread and an apartment
Under capitalism, factory ownership concentrates wealth. Your "bread and apartment" are garbage compared to bourgeois profits. Socialism eliminates private ownership of production, ensuring labor serves collective needs and not individual enrichment.
>It only worked in failed Monarchist feudal farming nations that hadn't liberalized enough
Socialism succeeded in transforming backward economies (USSR, China) into industrial powers, proving its adaptability. It’s not limited to feudal contexts but applies wherever class contradictions exist. Capitalism’s "liberalization" often masks intensified exploitation.
cont.