>>717729535
Current day Nintendo is literally for women. You are a tone dead retard and probably bought a Switch 2 due to retardation

>>717566273
>You yourself already posted all the romance officially in game and in the movie yourself too. Your blowing yourself out constantly.
no one says the romance was never a thing. the point is that nintendo is retconning it and branding peach or also zelda as more typical corpo-sanctioned, sales-optimized independent women who need no man and get things done while demasculating their male heroes (they literally admitted they make link more feminine so women can relate better as well). these are demonstrable facts you have to come to terms with

nintendo is for women and gays today

>>716420656
You say this while posting Animal Crossing, a freakshow management sim that was turned into an even gayer, cutesier Sims almost exclusively played by gays and women today.

The cope: >>716052514 (coming from a tripfag marketer of course)
Reality: Nintendo games are for girls today so had to add a human girl and give Donkey Kong a gayer design and retarded expressions

Every single one of their games today is somehow even more for women than Final Fantasy