>>535843002
I see zero reason to double the number of gens focused on niche narrative games.
>>535843056
1) I'm not a fucking 'baker', election tourist. I just make the next threads.
2) /lisg/ has endured years of content drought. But it was still relevant since LiS was still a series that actually existed. Once LiS no longer exists in any meaningful form, it makes no sense to continue to be LiS-first. Just changing to a more inclusive name would ultimately change little about the threads, beyond allowing us to actually continue beyond the death of LiS. My concern is with maintaining /lisg/ long term and that is not possible if we keep the albatross of a dead franchise around our necks.
As I said, the name change is inenitable. It is just not going to be this year, due to the final burst of corpse gasses being expelled from this dead franchise on the horizon.
>>535843746
/lisg/ has not taken surveys seriously, going back to LiS 1 episode 4. I'm not going to start now.
Especially not when it would involve letting this general die with a dead franchise.
>>535843954
My goal is to preserve /lisg/, tourist.
>>535843972
I likely. I basically did that to /lisg/ for ~2 years during the post-TC content drought.
Had I been there and actually supported a separate LR general, I could have kept it alive for a long time by myself.