>>513396920
exactly, maybe even a wider margin
>>513396950
I think there's a high chance AI will take the place of the retarded DEI workers from your argument
corporations are literal daycares, mostly run by retarded women, and AI hasn't been deployed at enterprise level yet, and it probably won't be for a couple years, it remains too expensive and volatile, it's not a finished product yet, but you can bet your nutsack half of google is working on creating the tools that will allow companies to either grow their workload, or cut on useless personnel, whether in the fashion of in-house software, or as an outsourced service
once becky the regional manager tests google's AI office-management tools 2030, and makes a cutesy linkedin post about it, it's over for office waggies
and by then, it will be smarter, cheaper, nicer, and most likely with a catchy voice interface
I don't think we'll see government protectionism this time like we saw with DEI, yuropoors will obviously try it, of course, but it will obviously fail just like they've failed at having an actual middle class
