>>519409051
>The planes being real actual planes doesn't mean there were no explosives in the buildings,
wow so you were unable to answer my question and instead chose to reinterpret my simple question in a way that serves your interests?
seems like kike pilpul which itself is evidence kikes did 911.
>and a lot of the "proof" is people not understanding how horrible mpeg compression was back then.
holy fucking zoomer shill, the footage was shot on VHS camcorder or news cameras, there is literally no MPEG compression involved you stupid fucking kike.
>You may be able to frame some things a certain way to fit your theory, but there is 10x more against it
so produce it, you can't.
>blah blah blah talking about the discussion to avoid the discussion of evidence.
the planes were hastily added in with commercially available masking technology, they used the explosives planted by the E-Team and inserted them backwards from that to avoid timing issues.
the over penetration is caused by vidrel here >>519400245

>>513133825
>what happed with peole in planes? ther just evaporated?
the 'planes' that hit the towers were masked in using commercially available software
the people made the phone calls after they landed-presumably at an airbase-and were then executed (probably by depressurizing the planes at altitude).
the real planes they were on were just rebadged and reentered service.

>>512180958
the white sparks of thermite?!?!
why that would imply traditional explosives made the fireballs that we think were caused by plane impacts!

>>508527187
>Doesn't even look like a plane strike to me it legit looks like an explosión/bomb
bingo