>>24668475
My other claim to fame is creating the Pepe some academics found as the “least rare Pepe on /pol/“. It’s so old it was made on an iBook G4.

Why do mathematicians hesitate so much to debunk obvious bullshit?
>Atiyah claims to have solved Riemann
>publishes a """proof""" where he talks about esoteric numerology and fucking Todd functions
>Mochizuki spends a DECADE grifting about having solved ABC
>two guys try to debunk him and none of the other specialists will discuss him
Are they just shy? Is there some culture that saying "that's retarded" is unacceptable to mathematicians?

>want more manufacturing
>tax raw materials at 50%+
>tax foreign manufactured cars at 15%
Who could have predicted this

>>511072005
Optics does not matter at all. Listen to Ted Cruz interview on Tucker's podcast. It's a biblical cosmic thing to them. There is literally no cost they are not willing to pay (on behalf of their constituents) in order to further their suicidal religious beliefs.
Some portion are those religious christcuck people, and some portion are just child rapists. There is probably also some overlap. But that's why things are the way they are.
This is the Cruz / Tucker interview:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smemFVe0l5E
The fact that they call those desert people religious fundamentalists while accidentally an entire empire because of their wrong interpretations of christcuckery is really something.

UNUSABLE BOARD
MILLIONS OF SPAM AND BBC THREADS UP
JANNIES DELETE THE ONE SINGLE /POL/ META THREAD AND LEAVE THE SPAM UP
DO YOUR FUCKING JOBS