>>17786602
>The Bible exists because of the Catholic Church, not the opposite.
Catholicism was one of the groups that tried to corrupt the Bible, anon. To this day they still use and promote a corrupted version that isn't based on the received text.

>>17775531
>No, these are passages from the New Testament.
They are more authoritative than anything you can come up with. I could also reference the different antichrist-related passages, but that would refer to a larger group of heresies, because there are others who deny Christ but do not LARP as Jews.

>not someone genuinely interested in historical discussion.
Authentic history I am interested in. But pilpul and presuppositionalist atheism, no, even if it calls itself historical. It isn't.