>>712668865
don't you no-true-scottsman me you son of a bitch, you know better than to engage in baseless 'i was here first' horseshit if you've really been here that long
>nobody did this when someone occasionally casually referred to someone as "they" because it was a gender neutral term even then
this is absolutely rose-tinted falsehoods and you're yearning for days we'll never be able to return to
i'm sorry anon
4chan has always been a confused angry shithole that can't decide if masturbating to men is gay or not