>>283004151
>I was replying to those who mentioned it,
But you clearly said I mentioned Alma-chan. Are you user meta obsessed?
>user meta obsessed
Isn't that what you're doing, with your random schizo label that you use for several people. You don't deny that you're the tripfag called LolisRDead, so why shouldn't I call you out?
It's not like you actually talk about the series. You're not talking about Alma in the Alma-chan thread either.