>>514868905
Yep, war is pretty gay now

>>513540753
everyone cares about the millian dead russians.
nobody cares about the million dead ukrainians.
>not even ukrainians

>>513309010
It makes more sense the less you think about it

>>513201667
Physically impossible

>>512986774
>14:1 death ratio is neither of those. Not proven and cannot logically be explained how it happened.

Daily reminder that 14:1 is an impossible casualty ratio

>>512889451
>that poll says nothing about what ukrainians would be willing to concede in negotiations.
I made no such claim.

It's strange, since 14:1 is such an astoundingly high casualty ratio, polls there should be even higher than they were a year ago

>>512854940 >>512854884
Curious on the source for this, but a casualty ratio within 2:1 makes it infinitely more believable

>>512821613
>so they'll capture in the span of 5 days what they couldn't in 3 years?
WW1 was also an attrition war as well and you'll recall the frontlines were basically static for a few years.

Approx a 1:1 casualty ratio based on picrel and drone/artillery ratios. Could be 1.5x to either side

>>512772135 >>512772284
Crazy, that meme barely lasted a week this time
Only one poster left clinging onto it

>>512687006
Thought-terminating cliche's require constant repetition

The less you think, the more you know
The more you know, the less you think
>>512661236

>>512310887
Anyone got sources to confirm Ukraine has a 14:1 drone advantage?

>>512297132
>past performace is not result of future results
Historical attrition wars tend to track casualty ratios very close to the artillery ratios. I don't see drones being any different than ultra-precise artillery, meaning I would expect the casualty ratio to track close to the drone deployment ratio.

Anyone got sources to confirm Ukraine has a 14:1 drone advantage?