>>82438649
>Do you think AI will eventually replace regular porn?
no, not at the rate it's progressing. honestly i think AI's place is better as a filter or supplement for a different program rather than a full software solution. something like VAM or VAM2 with a realistic or even stylized AI filter would be pretty interesting. i'm still somewhat hopeful for MR/AR even though it seems to be dead.

>>106464001
This shit only works for known architectures, only matters when you want to train the model from scratch for some reason and maybe for loras. Unreleased in-development models don't care.

>>106354009
hr roasties arent human so they'll actually prefer a bot answer

>>105600633
Truly the possibilities are endless.