>>64504435
>and not put dismounts in it, but that still doesn't mean it stops being an IFV
It does, actually. Because it doesn't carry a squad of troops.
>semantics
Literally the whole point, you mouth-breathing retard.

>>64412466
They still have, or had (Britain) tracked IFVs. But IFVs are expensive, so they get wheeled AFVs and use them in the IFV role.