>>105788512
i thought I tried to do that but i may simply be too retarded to know how. i thought because the 3939 port is listening on 80 I could change the other one to 80 instead and it would become doable. but this didn't seem to work at all. I could just not know enough about containers to know how to do this right. i did try asking ai about it, but it got really confused by the fact that I was trying to have it get me to the port as the host. It's like trying to ask it to draw a full wine glass it doesn't matter how many times you say truenas doesn't come with a web browser, that's all it knows how to do.

>>714252448
no one in this country currently alive has ever known freedom you fucking idiot.

>>105749237
>freebsd
thats no longer true.
>so most stuff is running in VMs on it anyway AFAIK
I'm pretty sure that's not the case because gpu use is relying on dedicated drivers installed in the host. 25.04 killed freebsd, much to core fans ire. but Ultimately I wouldn't know the difference anyway. I'm just going to point out though, that if I wanted to spin up a vm I could very easily do that in truenas right now, I'm trying to avoid doing that.

>>105749255
I am. but the app system afaik lets you run apps in jails on the bare metal. but apps do not allow access to multiple containers, so I have to use dockge or portainer, and those didn't work either, and I have no idea how to run every container and route the IP traffic between them when they are supposed to be seperated as a work around for the main apps system.
>>105749268
I believe so. iirc it has apt removed or disabled or something because of how its intended to be used but that says to me its probably debian based.

>>713873706
>local tripfag
newnigger-kun...