>>515587165
Hitler: also wrong in his beliefs.

The Holocaust was fake because there wasn’t even 6 million years in Germany at the time there was only 4 million it was just a story fabricated by the kike

god protects people he hates

That's not People's Car at all

did you guys know that hitler might of had jewish ancestry

I wish Hitler won WW2.

>go back in time and assassinate him
>germany and austria get fully jewed
>rest of the world notices the downfall of those nations, adopts stronger measures against jews
>the western world is saved by a more competent anti-semite

Am I on to something here?

>WE'RE GONNA TAKE YOU OUT AND LET BLACK MEN FUCK OUR WIVES AND HUMILIATE OUR TINY WHITE DICKS
-Anglo
Was this really the Anglo-Saxon thought process?

>>510521645
I got a positive role model for ya Ingerland

>>96016949
I have an idea... a final solution you could say

>In this Anglo-French world there exists, as it were, democracy, which means the rule of the people by the people. Now the people must possess some means of giving expression to their thoughts or their wishes. Analysing this problem more closely, we see that the people themselves have originally no convictions of their own. Their convictions are formed, of course, just as everywhere else. The decisive question is who enlightens the people, who educates them?

>In those countries, it is actually capital that rules; that is, nothing more than a clique of a few hundred men who possess untold wealth and, as a consequence of the peculiar structure of their national life, are more or less independent and free. They say: 'Here we have liberty.' By this they mean, above all, an uncontrolled economy, and by an uncontrolled economy, the freedom not only to acquire capital but to make absolutely free use of it. That means freedom from national control or control by the people both in the acquisition of capital and in its employment. This is really what they mean when they speak of liberty.

>These capitalists create their own press and then speak of the 'freedom of the press.' In reality, every one of the newspapers has a master, and in every case this master is the capitalist, the owner. This master, not the editor, is the one who directs the policy of the paper. If the editor tries to write other than what suits the master, he is ousted the next day. This press, which is the absolutely submissive and characterless slave of the owners, molds public opinion.

>Public opinion thus mobilized by them is, in its turn, split up into political parties. The difference between these parties is as small as it formerly was in Germany.

>You know them, of course - the old parties. They were always one and the same.

Why did he do it?

This is a piece of shit.

An absolute monster. This madman wanted bloodlust and conquest, oppressing people he did not agree with.

>>507118843
Just let the feds deport the illegals peacefully and then all of that other shit won't happen. You act like WE started the riots.

>>507104160
What the fuck does this rapist Indian immigrant looking for solidarity have to do with National Socialism?