>>724610143
You wouldn't even have a pot to piss in or even be alive nor your great grandparents and their great grandparents if copyright existed back when they were alive. You wouldn't even have bread to eat at the store or have a computer with electricity, pipe down retard. Everything you owe to your worthless pathetic existence is due to great men who were inventors and shared things freely.
4chan Search
4 results for "4f310f21b633e859e5b0a5089826fa50"
Gnosticism proven using math
Okay, so in Sethian cosmology, Goddess Sige ("Ain" in Kabbalah) is the "nothingness" or "void" befofe existence. Bythos is the "1". In computers, binary is a system of "1's and 0's". All information, even if it doesn't say "1" or "0" is still afterall, a 1 or a 0. This is a panentheistic teaching that God is both transcedent but yet immanent in all his creation.
A "0 bit reality" is not a formal theory but a speculative or thought-provoking extension of this foundation. It can be interpreted in several ways:
Pre-information existence: In computer science, zero bits represents the lack of any information or data. A "0 bit reality" could be a state of "pure potentiality"—the nothingness before the first "bit" of information is defined by an observer or measurement.
A universe from "nothing": The concept of a mathematical zero can be viewed as the foundation from which all numbers—and therefore all mathematical descriptions of the universe—are derived. This echoes the idea in physics that the universe could emerge from a vacuum, or nothingness.
Beyond binary: While quantum physics uses qubits that can be a superposition of 0 and 1, a "0 bit reality" would be a state even more fundamental than the binary choices we use to define reality. It may represent a level of existence beyond the structure of information as we know it, where everything exists as an undefinable potential.
The nature of reality itself: It can also be seen as an inquiry into the fundamental nature of reality. Is reality "real" even when unobserved, or is it fundamentally tied to the information we derive from it? Some interpretations of quantum physics suggest reality cannot be described without a link to observation.
You have the universe, the multiverse, the megaverse, the gigaverse, the teraverse, the exaverse, the xenoverse, the hyperverse, the omniverse and "the outside".
A "0 bit reality" is not a formal theory but a speculative or thought-provoking extension of this foundation. It can be interpreted in several ways:
Pre-information existence: In computer science, zero bits represents the lack of any information or data. A "0 bit reality" could be a state of "pure potentiality"—the nothingness before the first "bit" of information is defined by an observer or measurement.
A universe from "nothing": The concept of a mathematical zero can be viewed as the foundation from which all numbers—and therefore all mathematical descriptions of the universe—are derived. This echoes the idea in physics that the universe could emerge from a vacuum, or nothingness.
Beyond binary: While quantum physics uses qubits that can be a superposition of 0 and 1, a "0 bit reality" would be a state even more fundamental than the binary choices we use to define reality. It may represent a level of existence beyond the structure of information as we know it, where everything exists as an undefinable potential.
The nature of reality itself: It can also be seen as an inquiry into the fundamental nature of reality. Is reality "real" even when unobserved, or is it fundamentally tied to the information we derive from it? Some interpretations of quantum physics suggest reality cannot be described without a link to observation.
You have the universe, the multiverse, the megaverse, the gigaverse, the teraverse, the exaverse, the xenoverse, the hyperverse, the omniverse and "the outside".
I noticed that slavs generally have tendency to not be good with finances. Even if they acquire some wealth it very quickly disappeares because of mismanagement. It applies not only to eastern slavs but also to all slavs in general.
The book example is Nikola Tesla, who supposed to be a garilionaire only because of his one invention he made, but he lost all money on luxury shit and couldn't continue give fees and his patent expired. What causes this? Is it culture?
The book example is Nikola Tesla, who supposed to be a garilionaire only because of his one invention he made, but he lost all money on luxury shit and couldn't continue give fees and his patent expired. What causes this? Is it culture?
>>81938159
super luigi man
super luigi man