same as yesterday, shills will talk to shills and about 7-8pm eastern they get off shift and it will quiet down a lot, they also pickup activity drastically when bbby is mentioned and how the CEO of GameStop (Ryan Cohen) is still to this day directly involved.

https://x.com/sboho/status/1956023040485077041

>rc sells shares of bbby in august 2022

>rc has a sitdown with a famous corporate raider, Carl Icahn in october 2022

>rc offers 400 million for BBBY in December 2022

>pitchbook (prestigious M&A software suite) lists BBBY as sold in January 2023

>one month later, February 2023 RC tweets “someone tell the government to stop shooting down my balloons”, alluding to bad actors delaying the BBBY restructuring

>only media appearance RC has made since entering gme in 2020 has been gmedd.com

>Larry cheng (who helped RC build Chewy, and is a current boardmember at GameStop, and a close personal friend to RC) went onto theppshow podcast (which is dedicated to BBBY discussion) 8 months after they filed for chapter 11, and 2 months after shares were placed in abeyance

>all sorts of scitzo speculation is allowed on here, reddit, and twitter, but when you mention any of the above, which comes from primary sources, posts are censored and people come out of the woodwork to go berserk about it

>platinumsparkles was allowed onto a video conference call with Gary Gensler, which implies she was considered passive enough to not ask hardball questions. She also spends literally all day engaging with bbby content on Twitter and spends hours rebutting all of it.

>mass media outlets all bash RC and his activities surrounding GME/BBBY nonstop for years, even in the face of RC's deafening silence.
These are some strange occurrences surrounding Ryan Cohen and his activities.

Also, the owner of the worlds largest Omni channel company tweeted about ryan Cohen's BBBY deposition.
https://x.com/typesfast/status/1835848394104877347

Also Patrick Byrnes' old company; Overstock (which is the most famous example of a company battling naked shorts) purchased the BBBY IP

>>60617539
>>60617580
and the strangest thing about all of this is how the plumbing of financial markets even allow this to happen. We can talk about market makers being legally allowed to naked short for liquidity another time, but HOW IS IT POSSIBLE that NON market making entities can print fake shares. Imagine if Russian or Chinese agents started a firm in the U.S. and started printing fake shares for the top 50 companies... It wouldn't be allowed to happen because the eye in the sky (DTCC who has a full ledger in real time of all shares and where they are located) would shut it down immediately. And this quite basic conclusion leads to a much more serious one: that the DTCC allows non market making firms to print fake shares if you are "in the club". Literally a conspiracy.

>>60568031
2 things, explain to the class who overstock is and what their history is regarding naked short sellers.

and 2) explain why your id has a history in this thread of being an obvious bad actor/troll but then you come in with that chatgpt response when people start asking interesting (dangerous) questions that your bosses dont like?

back in the day Bloomberg did a documentary about GlobalLinks, a company where a guy bought over 110% of all shares, and over the next 3 days over 5000% of issued shares traded hands as volume. This case was discussed in some congressional hearing ~25 years ago.

Dole food is another famous case that even the MSM had to write articles about in order to try and steer the narrative, naked shorts once again.

Overstock is another example, naked shorts everywhere.

Imagine if Russian or Chinese agents came to the US and made a hedefund and started printing fake shares for the 50 largest companies on the markets.... Well you would be correct with your assumption that the eye in the sky (private company - DTCC) would notice immediately and shut that shit down for obvious national security reasons... so knowing that there is an eye in the sky watching, how come certain NON market making firms are allowed to print fake shares still to this day? Isn't it odd that the plumbing for the largest wealth machine on the planet allows non market making firms to print fake shares that were never borrowed.. isn't this a glaring vulnerability? If you are in the club the DTCC allows you to print fake shares.

>>60544675
>>60544679
>>60544681
bad actors out themselves this easily...

>>60544672
this guy is correct, ive tried baking several months ago and was met with the same strange errors and had to remove a ton of the copy pasta before the ("field too long") errors would go away, it wasn't a length error either, I confirmed that by baking threads with same length content just completely random and different to the gme bake.

No real gme holder looking to poke their head in here and consume information once in a while (or regularly) would think that this is behavior from jannies or shills is ok, no real holder would laugh at people trying to bake without the same secure tripcode thats been used for years.