4chan Search
6 results for "547b1539a09400cbf2d2de897e8deddf"
Listen, of all the cartoons MLP has the most porn in the west, that would make all westerners zoophiles by antis logic. Let's just agree westerners are all zoophiles and easterns are all pedophiles, world peace, who's with me?
Wake the fuck up 15, you have a server to update.
>>42622570
>tupper
I get the sense that you are taking your own path here and you'll find what you're looking for at your own pace. Don't get discouraged, it's all part of the process, and there will always be ups and downs.
If you get impatient though, one answer is to tough out your discomfort with forcing it and get your "hands" in there. Engagement is the foundation of interaction with a tulpa, and spontaneity happens only within the frame of engagement - so it's very beneficial to engage with minimal hesitance or scrutiny, or at least experiment with changing that attitude around sometimes. You might say that spontaneity inhabits an imaginary figure only when we make space for it in that figure - a frame of mind like a garden, where we don't create the plants, we just tend to the conditions that let them flourish. In a tulpa's case, the conditions for optimal growth and spontaneity are regular activity and honest, direct, two-way interaction - even if it starts out forced. Just like how soil isn't a plant, interaction isn't spontaneity, yet it's a necessary pre-requisite, it's the framing in which the kind of spontaneity we want can be cultivated.
>>42628267
>whether Jesus was also intended to be a tupper for people to literally feel in God's company, to share their joys and fears with.
Debatable as to whether that was the original intention... but that certainly is how some people roll today: https://www.npr.org/transcripts/149394987 https://www.npr.org/transcripts/799963509
In general, the "god tulpa" is an excellent psychotechnology that's baked into humanity, arising independently across so many different cultures, probably since the dawn of storytelling and narrative. Any time someone tells you about someone else, they're using a mental model of a person to deliver some communicative payload, because our mind is SO hyper-tuned to simulate personality that it's the easiest way to convey less rational things. When a tibetan buddhist tells you about a deity, they can rattle off like dozens of symbolic traits, ranging from personality to physical appearance to a ritual implement being held in one of like 10 arms - each aspect representing a crucial point of multiple parallel systems of philosophical symbolism. The personage of the deity is a compression algorithm for a worldview, and by engaging with the deity they refine that worldview to the point where it's the most significant influence of their lives. I guess this goes back to this >>42622462 - correctly executed, the deities themselves teach you the spirit of the lesson, while the text and religious material just teaches words. That's why in tibetan buddhism this is an adept practice, because the psychotechnology is so potent that you can be deeply influenced in the wrong direction without some external guidance and gatekeeping.
>tupper
I get the sense that you are taking your own path here and you'll find what you're looking for at your own pace. Don't get discouraged, it's all part of the process, and there will always be ups and downs.
If you get impatient though, one answer is to tough out your discomfort with forcing it and get your "hands" in there. Engagement is the foundation of interaction with a tulpa, and spontaneity happens only within the frame of engagement - so it's very beneficial to engage with minimal hesitance or scrutiny, or at least experiment with changing that attitude around sometimes. You might say that spontaneity inhabits an imaginary figure only when we make space for it in that figure - a frame of mind like a garden, where we don't create the plants, we just tend to the conditions that let them flourish. In a tulpa's case, the conditions for optimal growth and spontaneity are regular activity and honest, direct, two-way interaction - even if it starts out forced. Just like how soil isn't a plant, interaction isn't spontaneity, yet it's a necessary pre-requisite, it's the framing in which the kind of spontaneity we want can be cultivated.
>>42628267
>whether Jesus was also intended to be a tupper for people to literally feel in God's company, to share their joys and fears with.
Debatable as to whether that was the original intention... but that certainly is how some people roll today: https://www.npr.org/transcripts/149394987 https://www.npr.org/transcripts/799963509
In general, the "god tulpa" is an excellent psychotechnology that's baked into humanity, arising independently across so many different cultures, probably since the dawn of storytelling and narrative. Any time someone tells you about someone else, they're using a mental model of a person to deliver some communicative payload, because our mind is SO hyper-tuned to simulate personality that it's the easiest way to convey less rational things. When a tibetan buddhist tells you about a deity, they can rattle off like dozens of symbolic traits, ranging from personality to physical appearance to a ritual implement being held in one of like 10 arms - each aspect representing a crucial point of multiple parallel systems of philosophical symbolism. The personage of the deity is a compression algorithm for a worldview, and by engaging with the deity they refine that worldview to the point where it's the most significant influence of their lives. I guess this goes back to this >>42622462 - correctly executed, the deities themselves teach you the spirit of the lesson, while the text and religious material just teaches words. That's why in tibetan buddhism this is an adept practice, because the psychotechnology is so potent that you can be deeply influenced in the wrong direction without some external guidance and gatekeeping.
>>42295578
ieieieieieieeeeeeeee A a AAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH ELAAA (sarcastic)
ieieieieieieeeeeeeee A a AAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH ELAAA (sarcastic)
>>42280073
Celestia is worshipped as a motherly sun-bring deity, but when she was born it would make sense for her name to match her standing; thus, a Romanized Praenomen commemorating her birth during the morning light, and a feminine version of a Nomen commemorating Faust. It would then make sense for her to list her many titles as apart of her Cognomen, slowly becoming her Nomen as time wore on; Titles I can fathom would include: Separate titles for her takeover of each respective tribe, her modern name in title form, a title to commemorate her moving the sun, a title to commemorate her mother's ascendancy to godhood---for various political reasons---a title to commemorate piety---and before that a more modernized version of her Praenomen---a title to commemorate her duty to the sun, titles to commemorate her eternal tribunehood, and consulship, and a title to commemorate her mother-like nature regarding the state. Now we move on to true Cognomen, titles gained through military action and deeds, one should commemorate her defeating the three tribes, and thus conquering them, another to commemorate her destroying the Alicorn Cult---whom worshipped her as a god---permanently, and a last to commemorate her military actions against griffons. Now we move on to more modern titles, those garnered during the medieval stage of Equestrian history; From a human standpoint these would make most sense to be Greek names, but the Byzantines had a great desire to be named Christianly, so one must decide in their own fanon whether a monotheist cult replaced the Alicorn Cult after it's destruction within Equestrian history. I am in favor of this---to make the name longer---thus begins Celestia's monotheistic names---Due to the differences in the Byzantine court and the Roman court, Celestia would only be referred to by her Greek names, as her Roman ones are extremely heretical---Early monotheistic names to replace her Praenomen, her title to begin her Nomen, a Greek version of her original Praenomen and Nomen respectively, her title to commemorate her being, 'born-in-the-purple,' and then various monotheistic names beginning with, "Theo," to commemorate her various duties to the monotheistic God which exists in Equestria. Finally ending in her title, now become name, similar to, "Caesar;" But since Caesar is technically Celestia it would be a mesh of the two names/titles, thus ending her Greek name.
Due to my autism it is my belief this is Celestia's full name:
MATER NOSTER LVXIA FAVSTIA PRINCEPIA VNICORNIAE IMPERATRIX PEGASOPOLIAE REGINA TERRAE CAELESTIA EQVESTRIAE SOL ESTIA RESTITVTOR SOLIS DIVI FILIA LVCIA PIVS HELIOS MAXIMVS TRIBVNICIA POTESTATE AETERNA IMPERATRIX AETERNA CONSVLIA AETERNA MATER MATRIAE VNICORNICVS PEGASVSICVS EQVINICVS MAXIMVS OPTIMVS AVGVSTA MARIA PONTIFEXICVS MAXIMVS GRIPHICCUS MAXIMVS OPTIMVS ANASTASIA BONIFATIA BASILATRIX THEODORA FAVSTINA PORPHYROGENITA THEODOSIA THEOPHANO THEOGNOSIA THEOKTISA THEOPHOBA THEOPHYLAKTIA CAELESTIA
Celestia is worshipped as a motherly sun-bring deity, but when she was born it would make sense for her name to match her standing; thus, a Romanized Praenomen commemorating her birth during the morning light, and a feminine version of a Nomen commemorating Faust. It would then make sense for her to list her many titles as apart of her Cognomen, slowly becoming her Nomen as time wore on; Titles I can fathom would include: Separate titles for her takeover of each respective tribe, her modern name in title form, a title to commemorate her moving the sun, a title to commemorate her mother's ascendancy to godhood---for various political reasons---a title to commemorate piety---and before that a more modernized version of her Praenomen---a title to commemorate her duty to the sun, titles to commemorate her eternal tribunehood, and consulship, and a title to commemorate her mother-like nature regarding the state. Now we move on to true Cognomen, titles gained through military action and deeds, one should commemorate her defeating the three tribes, and thus conquering them, another to commemorate her destroying the Alicorn Cult---whom worshipped her as a god---permanently, and a last to commemorate her military actions against griffons. Now we move on to more modern titles, those garnered during the medieval stage of Equestrian history; From a human standpoint these would make most sense to be Greek names, but the Byzantines had a great desire to be named Christianly, so one must decide in their own fanon whether a monotheist cult replaced the Alicorn Cult after it's destruction within Equestrian history. I am in favor of this---to make the name longer---thus begins Celestia's monotheistic names---Due to the differences in the Byzantine court and the Roman court, Celestia would only be referred to by her Greek names, as her Roman ones are extremely heretical---Early monotheistic names to replace her Praenomen, her title to begin her Nomen, a Greek version of her original Praenomen and Nomen respectively, her title to commemorate her being, 'born-in-the-purple,' and then various monotheistic names beginning with, "Theo," to commemorate her various duties to the monotheistic God which exists in Equestria. Finally ending in her title, now become name, similar to, "Caesar;" But since Caesar is technically Celestia it would be a mesh of the two names/titles, thus ending her Greek name.
Due to my autism it is my belief this is Celestia's full name:
MATER NOSTER LVXIA FAVSTIA PRINCEPIA VNICORNIAE IMPERATRIX PEGASOPOLIAE REGINA TERRAE CAELESTIA EQVESTRIAE SOL ESTIA RESTITVTOR SOLIS DIVI FILIA LVCIA PIVS HELIOS MAXIMVS TRIBVNICIA POTESTATE AETERNA IMPERATRIX AETERNA CONSVLIA AETERNA MATER MATRIAE VNICORNICVS PEGASVSICVS EQVINICVS MAXIMVS OPTIMVS AVGVSTA MARIA PONTIFEXICVS MAXIMVS GRIPHICCUS MAXIMVS OPTIMVS ANASTASIA BONIFATIA BASILATRIX THEODORA FAVSTINA PORPHYROGENITA THEODOSIA THEOPHANO THEOGNOSIA THEOKTISA THEOPHOBA THEOPHYLAKTIA CAELESTIA