>>520129892
Also
>comparing niggerjeets to Africans
Unfair. See picrel.
4chan Search
15 results for "580385da83d499fa0519d89e35d7eddb"
>>519249037
Again there's no comparison.
Again there's no comparison.
>>518924623
>>518924822
Surprisingly even Africans became brownpilled on the Indian Hindu shitskin problem.
>>518924822
Surprisingly even Africans became brownpilled on the Indian Hindu shitskin problem.
>>516684145
Jeets are the dalits of the world, you are beneath the rest of humanity. Back to your shit hole.
Jeets are the dalits of the world, you are beneath the rest of humanity. Back to your shit hole.
>"The Indian was incapable of ruling himself." "The British Empire did not conquer India with superior numbers of men, but with superior race." "The English have a faculty for treating peoples as half-monkeys... I don't even see that as entirely unjustified." "The British have taught the Indian how to walk upright. Without the British, these people would still be living in the trees like animals." "India is a place of chaos and weakness.” “They have a long history, but it is a history of decline and stagnation. Their culture is backward, superstitious, and weak.”
Adolf Hitler (1920s-1930s)
>"I hate Indians. They are a beastly people with a beastly religion."
Winston Churchill (1942)
>They [Indians] are superb flatterers. They are masters at flattery. They are masters at subtle flattery. That's how they survived 600 years. They suck up...their great skill is to suck up to people in key positions.
Henry Kissinger (1971)
>They [Indians] turn me off! They are repulsive and it's easy to be tough with them.
Richard Nixon (1971)
The consensus is nothing short of remarkable, and it proves that you are genetically revolting and it's only natural for all humans to be naturally repulsed by you.
Adolf Hitler (1920s-1930s)
>"I hate Indians. They are a beastly people with a beastly religion."
Winston Churchill (1942)
>They [Indians] are superb flatterers. They are masters at flattery. They are masters at subtle flattery. That's how they survived 600 years. They suck up...their great skill is to suck up to people in key positions.
Henry Kissinger (1971)
>They [Indians] turn me off! They are repulsive and it's easy to be tough with them.
Richard Nixon (1971)
The consensus is nothing short of remarkable, and it proves that you are genetically revolting and it's only natural for all humans to be naturally repulsed by you.
>that community note
jeets are such retards.
jeets are such retards.
>>513971191
>Even Africans
Please stop insulting Africans by insinuating they're like niggerjeets. It's dumb, inaccurate, and plays right into the jeets' hands.
>Even Africans
Please stop insulting Africans by insinuating they're like niggerjeets. It's dumb, inaccurate, and plays right into the jeets' hands.
>>513943491
Africans are far, far more civilized than niggerjeets will ever be. That's always been the case.
Africans are far, far more civilized than niggerjeets will ever be. That's always been the case.
>>513853678
I already said that even Africans are far less incompatible with human civilization than jeets, because while blacks generally have low IQ and poor impulse control, they more or less want the same things. Jeets don’t, nor do they even have the instinct for it. That’s what’s so hard for people to internalize. Just look at Africa and india, the latter is incomparably worse -- always was and always will be.
Fun fact: the British used both chinks and jeet slaves in their colonies (e.g., Southeast Asia), but they tried to keep the number of chinks to the bare minimum needed for jobs jeets can't do, for instance mining because jeets are too physically weak. The Brits knew chinks would rebel if conditions allowed it, whereas the docile natural-born slave jeets, while utterly incompetent, were considered safe and useful enough in sheer numbers for menial jobs like palm oil plantations. If those were chinks they would've rebelled and the British knew this.
I already said that even Africans are far less incompatible with human civilization than jeets, because while blacks generally have low IQ and poor impulse control, they more or less want the same things. Jeets don’t, nor do they even have the instinct for it. That’s what’s so hard for people to internalize. Just look at Africa and india, the latter is incomparably worse -- always was and always will be.
Fun fact: the British used both chinks and jeet slaves in their colonies (e.g., Southeast Asia), but they tried to keep the number of chinks to the bare minimum needed for jobs jeets can't do, for instance mining because jeets are too physically weak. The Brits knew chinks would rebel if conditions allowed it, whereas the docile natural-born slave jeets, while utterly incompetent, were considered safe and useful enough in sheer numbers for menial jobs like palm oil plantations. If those were chinks they would've rebelled and the British knew this.
>>513699978
It has nothing to do with poverty. Their species is simply just disgusting.
Dung beetles won't stop eating shit just because there's steak available.
It has nothing to do with poverty. Their species is simply just disgusting.
Dung beetles won't stop eating shit just because there's steak available.
>>513275543
They're appropriating jeet culture.
They're appropriating jeet culture.
>>512936074
Niggers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> niggerjeets.
Niggers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> niggerjeets.
>>512344714
Also picrel.
Also picrel.
>>507196750
Also check out this 1919 report on mass indian migration into British Kenya, comparing niggers to niggerjeets back then.
Also check out this 1919 report on mass indian migration into British Kenya, comparing niggers to niggerjeets back then.