>>64414257
>unsuppressed 22lr
>nowhere near 125dB
I suppose you're technically correct, but the DIRECTION of "nowhere near 125dB" is the opposite of what one would want for hearing safe lol.
4chan Search
2 results for "58d8adccea877db7e4c2b54f3c32e22c"
>>64277975
>A big enough audio system can play loud, that's not too difficult
Anon, an unsuppressed gun report is like 155-175dB, usually more towards the upper end for center fire rifles. Guns are loud. Image related is out of date and suppressors can do a little bit better nowadays, but not THAT much better without getting into weird shit like wipes nobody uses. You can get somewhat lower with 300bo subs and such but it'll still be like 100-115 at best, and at <130 action noise in an auto becomes a non-trivial consideration too.
Like, yeah you could physically create a speaker system that could do 100-140 but now you're getting into legit hearing damage territory with even minimal use which is just not a very attractive feature to consumers right? I'm just saying that after reflecting I'm realizing that the whole category of "things that are actively unpleasant or even dangerous to human senses" is an inherently hard thing for reproduction. Like, to take something else entirely, you might remember that at one point one gimmick that got investigated was having media that could reproduce smell. And they came up with some pretty cool tech actually. And yeah there was some cost/complexity challenges, but the really fundamental issue was that people just don't WANT to experience what a battlefield or the like actually smells like.
I guess I'm just thinking out loud here, but interesting to me that this is another area where we as humans are often losing a piece of reality? More and more folks don't really KNOW what things are like, I mean forget /k/, even like, a farm or something.
>A big enough audio system can play loud, that's not too difficult
Anon, an unsuppressed gun report is like 155-175dB, usually more towards the upper end for center fire rifles. Guns are loud. Image related is out of date and suppressors can do a little bit better nowadays, but not THAT much better without getting into weird shit like wipes nobody uses. You can get somewhat lower with 300bo subs and such but it'll still be like 100-115 at best, and at <130 action noise in an auto becomes a non-trivial consideration too.
Like, yeah you could physically create a speaker system that could do 100-140 but now you're getting into legit hearing damage territory with even minimal use which is just not a very attractive feature to consumers right? I'm just saying that after reflecting I'm realizing that the whole category of "things that are actively unpleasant or even dangerous to human senses" is an inherently hard thing for reproduction. Like, to take something else entirely, you might remember that at one point one gimmick that got investigated was having media that could reproduce smell. And they came up with some pretty cool tech actually. And yeah there was some cost/complexity challenges, but the really fundamental issue was that people just don't WANT to experience what a battlefield or the like actually smells like.
I guess I'm just thinking out loud here, but interesting to me that this is another area where we as humans are often losing a piece of reality? More and more folks don't really KNOW what things are like, I mean forget /k/, even like, a farm or something.