>>536778117
>Cream isn't a replacement, she's just a better example of a friend for Sonic and a compassionate supporting character who also loves adventue.
Tails was created to be "Sonic's Sidekick". Amy was created to be "Sonic's Love Interest". Cream was created to be "Sonic's Love Interest's Sidekick". And is overall just a Girl version of Tails, the same way Amy is just a Girl version of Sonic. You're approaching this with the perspective that if there was gonna be a compassionate girl character for Sonic to have around, it should only be Cream. As if Tails & Amy should both be deleted for the sake of a Girl Tails instead.
That's ridiculous. These characters all have their place, and Cream should never be a replacement for Amy or even Tails. Cream is Cream, and she has her spot on Team Rose and the extended Sonic cast. But it's Tails and Amy who are both Sonic's best friends that he's known the longest.
>Sonic and Amy's toxic one-sided situationship is... disheartening, to say the least. Some might even say demoralizing.
That's Ian Flynn logic, and it's wrong. Sonic & Amy's relationship is just fine. It's not toxic for either of them.
>nd people who feel sorry for this clearly mentally unwell little girl will often have complaints of the franchise that it must change so she can get her impossible wish fulfillment.
All Amy wants is to be with Sonic. As long as Amy is by Sonic's side having the time of her life, she's happy. It doesn't take all that much to make Amy happy when she's really not asking for much in the first place.
She's not looking to settle down and live a domestic life, she is a twelve year old girl chasing THE WIND all over the planet, driven purely by the whims of her heart. "Settling down" is a far-off concept for Amy. If Sonic has a boy's heart forever, Amy has a girl's heart forever.
Amy Rose was never designed or intended to be an "Anchor" to Sonic's freedom. And she has never been portrayed as such, period.