>>17942219
>I don't take orders from maggots
quaking in my boots
>The vast majority mention slavery explicitly.
citation needed? i only know of four actual declaration-style list of grievances passed by seceding states, two of which invoke slavery explicitly and one which sort of sidesteps the issue. mississippi doesn't mention it at all and the others didn't put out a list/statement. are you counting kentucky and missouri here? maryland? delaware, sort of?
>These are all twaddle
if you don't give a shit what they said why are you on an imageboard about history? interpret their words however you want i guess, but that makes for a pretty shallow moral victory
>Tariffs and shit are not what they're bitching about
see above. you are not a righteous internet warrior, you're just an ideologue looking for easy dunks, the road to secession and civil war is more complex than le slavery. that works for a highschool textbook but cmon, use your brain a little
