>>718875627
confirmed: all the faggots on here that complain about "parry slop" are journalist tier casuals

>>715927452
better than you? yes
better than me? no

Here's a very good method all of you can use to immediately disregard 90% of useless feedback

Let's say that some know-it-all post you a comment somewhere telling you that you should do A B and C to 'improve' your game. Ask yourself
- is this person my follower on this platform?
- is this peroson my follower on any platform at all?
- if yes, does this person ever engage with my content in any way?
- is this person a paying customer?
- has this person in any way supported your work?

If you answered 'no' to any of this you can immediately throw it in the trash. You can use your judgement to evaluate the other 10% of situations. Cheers.