>>724102056
This is your brain on corporate propaganda.
Literally everything these days is just taking observable objective facts that nobody will disagree with, and then simply applying Orwellian revisionism to make true statements not actually mean the same thing anymore.
In this case it's trying to frame the existence of a monopoly as good or bad not implicitly within a marketplace, but is introducing the existence of a state entity (???) into the argument as if anyone fucking asked. When questioned, the debater will refuse to remove the rogue element from their retarded viewpoint.
Instead of there being a debate between two contrasting points, it becomes a cyclical semantic argument where one person just stubbornly refuses to admit they have reinterpreted a pre-existing objective statement, and so it is the same outcome as religious shitflinging.
What a fucking future we live in.
4chan Search
2 results for "5f6739237f17f065a856ca6b7b3f72fb"
>>722993667
This doesn't make any sense as a perspective when you:
a) Consider the nature of biology and mate selection
b) Consider the pressures placed on men which are of an equally oppressive but different nature
c) Consider that gender norms are prrimarily forced by the expectations of the opposite sex and thus society is at all times entirely culpable for whatever injustice it claims exists towards one sex
d) Consider history as a whole and how women have continued to benefit from male success, but consistently need to reframe the entirety of civilisation and its structural fabric to craft the exact convenient perspective required that makes them a victim
e) Consider that historically women have always oppressed other women with no particular desire to change this, whilst men in positions of power have been responsible for limiting whatever societal limitations were placed on women in the first place
It's fine as a story, as a perspective of a particularly ignorant and narrow-minded character, but if it's trying to make a statement about society it is a woefully overdone, boring and essentially very wrong take that always requires ignoring about 30+ observable truths about reality - which is ironically exactly what people accuse women of doing when it comes to addressing problems in their life.
This doesn't make any sense as a perspective when you:
a) Consider the nature of biology and mate selection
b) Consider the pressures placed on men which are of an equally oppressive but different nature
c) Consider that gender norms are prrimarily forced by the expectations of the opposite sex and thus society is at all times entirely culpable for whatever injustice it claims exists towards one sex
d) Consider history as a whole and how women have continued to benefit from male success, but consistently need to reframe the entirety of civilisation and its structural fabric to craft the exact convenient perspective required that makes them a victim
e) Consider that historically women have always oppressed other women with no particular desire to change this, whilst men in positions of power have been responsible for limiting whatever societal limitations were placed on women in the first place
It's fine as a story, as a perspective of a particularly ignorant and narrow-minded character, but if it's trying to make a statement about society it is a woefully overdone, boring and essentially very wrong take that always requires ignoring about 30+ observable truths about reality - which is ironically exactly what people accuse women of doing when it comes to addressing problems in their life.