>>96250568
>you do realize, anon, that when an artist posts an image to some manner of hosting service to display it to the public, that they no longer retain universal distribution rights in perpetuity?
They actually do. Automatic copyright applies as soon as the work has been created and can't be voided unless you explicitly enter into an actual contract. The hosting service you mentioned generally don't care and don't control who uploads the image, so they can't sensibly claim that their TOS grants them the right of the commercial use of anything hosted on their services.

Also stealing your product to train a machine that is literally meant to shit into your sandwich (and that could not identify a sandwich without millions of people having been forced to point at all manners of sandwiches for years) is not a case of fair use.

>>96233431
At least make her a redhead.