>>513036999
What's even the point of posting this over and over?

First of all, even a year of NEETing makes you unappealing to employers, assuming you had a job before that. So, your whole 'decades' concern is irrelevant.

Second, >>513037894 if the point is simple humiliation, why do you care when or if a NEET necks themselves? Sounds more like you're scared of a revolt, but you also say NEETS are too weak for that. So really.. aren't you just wasting your own time? Time that you could be recharging from work?

>>510346460
>negligible
Ha! I knew this was going to be said. It's always, "it's okay when we do it! What about x that your people do tho?"
Like fucking clockwork