>>521024705
>electric universe stuff?
yes
>At least drop a link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUe-sUCP2hU
4chan Search
7 results for "6ac7516718655d48dbff5a873623f8e7"
>>520384671
>can you quote were you are getting this absolute nonsense from?
linga purana and matsya purana
>So the purana differentiates Shani and Shiva.
different names for different stages in the capture event
>can you quote were you are getting this absolute nonsense from?
linga purana and matsya purana
>So the purana differentiates Shani and Shiva.
different names for different stages in the capture event
>>519378814
> In Europe, Italians are considered high class people
only a fucking dumbed down burger can be so fucking wrong. america is a true shithole country.
> In Europe, Italians are considered high class people
only a fucking dumbed down burger can be so fucking wrong. america is a true shithole country.
>>519380150
>I thought
everything you think to have learned from the mainstream is wrong and disinformation.
as already mentioned, all stars are externally powered through electric currents, so called Birkeland Currents.
the most important factor in determining any given star’s characteristics is the strength of the current density in Amperes per square meter (A/m2) measured at that star’s surface.
If a star’s incoming current density increases, the arc discharges on its surface (photospheric tufts) will get hotter, change color (away from red, toward blue), and get brighter.
The absolute brightness of a star, therefore, depends on two things: the strength of the current density impinging into its surface, and the star’s size (the star’s diameter).
>I thought
everything you think to have learned from the mainstream is wrong and disinformation.
as already mentioned, all stars are externally powered through electric currents, so called Birkeland Currents.
the most important factor in determining any given star’s characteristics is the strength of the current density in Amperes per square meter (A/m2) measured at that star’s surface.
If a star’s incoming current density increases, the arc discharges on its surface (photospheric tufts) will get hotter, change color (away from red, toward blue), and get brighter.
The absolute brightness of a star, therefore, depends on two things: the strength of the current density impinging into its surface, and the star’s size (the star’s diameter).
>>519319580
>still doesnt explain why they are saying
the explanation is because the mainstream jew "scientists" are morons who dont understand or dont want to understand that space is a place full of plasma and electric current flowing through that plasma. so instead they come up with retarded ideas and explanations.
you can never figure any of this shit out if you subscribe to failed jewish "science" and their failed newtonian ideas and ignore the obvious.
fact is comets are electric and everything that is happening is not surprising and was already predicted ages ago.
>there is a tail when the tail isn't there.
the "tail" is facing the sun see >>519314569
>4. Anti-tail gases escaping in a sunward direction
>an electrically charged nucleus immersed in the heliospheric plasma develops asymetric discharges concentrated on the sunlit side. charged particles then accelerate along local electric fields, guided by the comets fluctuating charge and its current pathways into the surrounding plasma.
at any given time, the strength of the current density (Amps per square meter) that is passing through the plasma determines its mode of operation.
As a rule of thumb, the stronger the electric current, the brighter the plasma.
>still doesnt explain why they are saying
the explanation is because the mainstream jew "scientists" are morons who dont understand or dont want to understand that space is a place full of plasma and electric current flowing through that plasma. so instead they come up with retarded ideas and explanations.
you can never figure any of this shit out if you subscribe to failed jewish "science" and their failed newtonian ideas and ignore the obvious.
fact is comets are electric and everything that is happening is not surprising and was already predicted ages ago.
>there is a tail when the tail isn't there.
the "tail" is facing the sun see >>519314569
>4. Anti-tail gases escaping in a sunward direction
>an electrically charged nucleus immersed in the heliospheric plasma develops asymetric discharges concentrated on the sunlit side. charged particles then accelerate along local electric fields, guided by the comets fluctuating charge and its current pathways into the surrounding plasma.
at any given time, the strength of the current density (Amps per square meter) that is passing through the plasma determines its mode of operation.
As a rule of thumb, the stronger the electric current, the brighter the plasma.
>>514862424
>You're confusing Kronos (ie. Saturn) with Chronos (ie. Time).
actually there is no confusion here.
Saturn is often associated with "Time" because when the capture event was happening is when Time began.
before that earth was a tidal locked satellite around Saturn and there was no day and night cycle.
only when it got closer to the present sun and its system it began to appear to move in the sky.
thats when people figured out how to measure time.
>You're confusing Kronos (ie. Saturn) with Chronos (ie. Time).
actually there is no confusion here.
Saturn is often associated with "Time" because when the capture event was happening is when Time began.
before that earth was a tidal locked satellite around Saturn and there was no day and night cycle.
only when it got closer to the present sun and its system it began to appear to move in the sky.
thats when people figured out how to measure time.
>>512156168
tl;dr is "shitskins ruin everything"
tl;dr is "shitskins ruin everything"