>>60793251
Most wallets are in the negative which means the OGs already sold and got out. Most holders now are creepy virgins who who bought at $30+ cause they fell for the Indian online shill campaigns.
>>60763069
It's forced and makes no sense. Like when an anon attempted to make a Link general here the other day. It got to 4 replies before it died and every reply was about XRP. There's already an entire general to talk about XRP
>>60738395
Bro LINK has been dead for half a decade and isn't even in the top 10. Why the fuck would they accept LINK?
The Japanese have rejected LINK although it still remains very popular in India.
Seriously are there any Indians here that can reach out to their cousins and friends or something and get them to unblock me. All I did was post the video in the comments and say I'm excited about the future and I was blocked. This is no way to treat your investors.
>>60684078
The token itself is not needed therefore it doesn't really have any value left. Companies are partnering with Chainlink the company not the coin. They don't need the coin. It serves no purpose. Investors simply aren't interested in LINK anymore now that the SEC Case against Ripple etc is coming to a resolution.
