>>16839938
>Please tell me that all parts in this game are procedural
From what I've read they're not going the procedural tanks route, but they're doing this "sub parts" system. So for example, you have your 3m diameter tanks, but you also have variants of it, like tall, medium, short. And this is just one part, you don't have to go looking for it like in KSP or have to install a dozen mods, this would be part of the stock game. We've already seen it with the RCS tanks. Instead of a billion variants which have little to no difference you get a few options and then you can customize them freely. This means you no longer have to clip your RCS nozzles into your ship just to get an inset look.

>>723834096
>sounds good but can my shitty laptop run it?
Probably with lower graphics. They're trying to make the engine as performant as possible. If you have a gigafuckshit station made of a million parts it will run better than Kerbal for sure.
>also multiplayer?
Possibly.