>>513997317
Wouldn't that imply the existence of infinite hoholism? Or will it decay eventually as the distance increases?
Would that mean there is a point of balance where the maximum hoholism is possible where it balances with apathy? A "Lagrange" like point in space?

>>536067453
Characters are intentionally caricatural. They are one-dimensional megalomaniacs. Even a simple rhetorical question that touches their ego triggers them and make them start ranting. It's not deep indeed but it doesn't need to be. If there is something worse than being shallow in writing, it's going out of your depth and drafting pseudo profound dialogues. I can't blame anyone for keeping things simple.

>>40838590
if he had children they would be

> children of odom