Search results for "6dd43b0052d5a17ed9444ee26b58a6eb" in md5 (5)

/pol/ - new 'toss
Anonymous United States No.513462378
>>513458614
Wait until you find out what they named their military AI. It's part of their hubris and superstition. They have to elude to the truth while they lie about it. Then they keep trophies and brag about it. The hate people have for them throughout history is well founded.
/pol/ - Thread 512685721
Anonymous United States No.512693049
>>512692289
There's absolutely no point arguing with flat earthers spurdo anon. My grandfather was one of the lead engineers that designed and built the satellite that monitored solar radiation for the Apollo mission and I've posted summaries of the radiation and it's tested effects and it was pointless. They don't care. You can literally look up the time the ISS is overhead and physically look at it with a pair of basic bitch binoculars and idiots here will tell you with a straight face that it's a prop on a set somewhere. Half of them are far to vested in trying to spoil actual human achievement to listen to reason. The other half are trolls and well poisoning shills and there's no point in wasting your time on them either.
/pol/ - HAPPENING: Israel's Gaza Final Cleansing Attempt In September
Anonymous United States No.509685884
>>509685057
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/03/israel-gaza-ai-database-hamas-airstrikes
"israeli A.i. targeting system "lavender" was programmed to approve of 15-20 civilian fatalities per/militant killed"
>"Several of the sources described how, for certain categories of targets, the IDF applied pre-authorised allowances for the estimated number of civilians who could be killed before a strike was authorised".
>"Two sources said that during the early weeks of the war they were permitted to kill 15 or 20 civilians during airstrikes on low-ranking militants"

israel prioritizes killing children because, in thier words, they are simply "killing tomorrows terrorists today!"
/pol/ - ITS SO OVER!
Anonymous United States No.508812457
>>508810051
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/03/israel-gaza-ai-database-hamas-airstrikes
"israeli A.i. targeting system "lavender" was programmed to approve of 15-20 civilian fatalities per/militant killed"
>"Several of the sources described how, for certain categories of targets, the IDF applied pre-authorised allowances for the estimated number of civilians who could be killed before a strike was authorised".
>"Two sources said that during the early weeks of the war they were permitted to kill 15 or 20 civilians during airstrikes on low-ranking militants"
its "REAL" because it was posted on a major western news outlet, it WASNT challenged, it WASNT redacted
if something so specifically heinous like
>"israeli A.i. targeting system "lavender" was programmed to approve of 15-20 civilian fatalities per/militant killed"


idf civillian targeting doctrine:
>The Dahiya doctrine, or Dahya doctrine,[1] is an Israeli military strategy involving the large-scale destruction of civilian infrastructure, or domicide, to pressure hostile governments.[2] The doctrine was outlined by former Israel Defense Forces (IDF) Chief of General Staff Gadi Eizenkot. Israel colonel Gabi Siboni wrote that Israel "should target economic interests and the centers of civilian power that support the organization".[3] The logic is to harm the civilian population so much that they will then turn against the militants, forcing the enemy to sue for peace.[3][4]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dahiya_doctrine
/pol/ - Microsoft center in Israel hit by Iran.
Anonymous United States No.508119985
>>508109622
LMAO
>israeli AI called: LAVENDER
used to 'select targets' for the idf, and was programmed with the caveat that 15-20 civilian deaths PER MILITANT killed was a totally fine, acceptable even, number:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/03/israel-gaza-ai-database-hamas-airstrikes
"israeli A.i. targeting system "lavender" was programmed to approve of 15-20 civilian fatalities per/militant killed"
>"Several of the sources described how, for certain categories of targets, the IDF applied pre-authorised allowances for the estimated number of civilians who could be killed before a strike was authorised".
>"Two sources said that during the early weeks of the war they were permitted to kill 15 or 20 civilians during airstrikes on low-ranking militants"
its "REAL" because it was posted on a major western news outlet, it WASNT challenged, it WASNT redacted
if something so specifically heinous like
>"israeli A.i. targeting system "lavender" was programmed to approve of 15-20 civilian fatalities per/militant killed"