>>719226049
im not, no, I want child panties for sexual reasons

but why should that stop normal people from seeing normal things?

>>714008096
>panties have meaning?
yes, obviously
This is me.

>>713159847
Agreed, that and of course panties for the pantsu lovers, depending on the outfit you select for her.
Each one having different panties or style of spats (different pantylines under the spats, of course, at least one spats without a pantyline...)

Heres the good news, im a britbong and its currently
>a big heatwave
>the new fashion for girls is spats or yogapants and nothing on top, no skirt, no shorts, just skin tight yogapants/spats/tights/leggings with NOTHING covering the bum
>yes, this includes women of all ages.
anons, its so hard to focus on the way to work passing the school. I-I think I may be a p... p...