>>17970065
>With Jesus you see a clear fulfillment in just the most incredible profound unexpected ways, of all aspects of the Old Testament.
This is just unjustified opinion and thus can be discarded. When we read the OT and NT we can also find the same thing about the final prophet. A lot of messianic prophecies that you think are fulfilled actually are not according to Jews, many are even completely invented or just misunderstood so I see where they are coming from sometimes.
>if it feels like divine truths?
Yes! But my personal feelings are irrelevant, that's not how you demonstrate things. The Quran referencing previous scripture is not a problem, the NT does the same yet you believe it is divine truth
>that Jesus is so obviously morally perfect and even you Muslims see that, that he comes to judge the living and the dead on Yawm Ad Din
No, he will judge the world with God's perfect laws like an earthly judge when he comes back. Much like the OT idea of the Messiah, there's nothing there about a mangod who just has to die.
>to act in boundless love and forgiveness and save our very natures
There's nothing loving or forgiving about an innocent man acting as a sin chicken to save us from sins we didn't even commit (original sin).
>than the belief that a book allowing for sex slaves is somehow the speech of God.
The bible is not the word of God?
>I don’t care that it’s difficult to believe God would become a man.
It's not "difficult", it is just impossible because it posits direct logical contradictions and it also goes against the older scriptures. When God says he is not a man then he is not a man, simple.
