>>520586796
They aren't. They are literally depopulating russia, as explained by this z nigger
https://files.catbox.moe/f7kicc.mp4
This while being disadvantaged in every way. Russia has 10 times the economy, 10 times the military budget, 4 times the population, who knows how many times the amount of every kind of air craft, artillery piece, munition of every kind, ect.
>has the entire might of NATO and the US behind it.
Where are the air craft carriers? Where are the modern stealth air craft, the radar planes, strategic bombers, fighters, ect? Why are the Ukrainians using Mig 29s from the 80s? Where are the NATO allied units with boots on the ground?
4chan Search
8 results for "72c6cfe488cde1f423348ae7adb0b58e"
>>519776315
>cope attempt by you
100 hours to beat the world's forth army. Meanwhile, picrel. Russia will NEVER know what it's like to do a regime change. By the way, OEF started on Oct 7th 2001, and Kabul was taken and regime change occured of the taliban by Nov 13th. Russia never came close to regime change in afghanistan. Russia sucks ass at war. They are to stupid to do maneuver warfare. All of the intelligent russians were killed in the soviet purges. This is still happening, by the way. They still kill their most innovative people, all of the time, including business people. A lot of people fall out of windows there, and die of other interesting ways.
>cope attempt by you
100 hours to beat the world's forth army. Meanwhile, picrel. Russia will NEVER know what it's like to do a regime change. By the way, OEF started on Oct 7th 2001, and Kabul was taken and regime change occured of the taliban by Nov 13th. Russia never came close to regime change in afghanistan. Russia sucks ass at war. They are to stupid to do maneuver warfare. All of the intelligent russians were killed in the soviet purges. This is still happening, by the way. They still kill their most innovative people, all of the time, including business people. A lot of people fall out of windows there, and die of other interesting ways.
>>519586397
The question is stupid anyways. Russia is in fact continually marginally advancing, but they are massively advantaged in every way. They should have already won. It should have been like when we beat Iraq in the first gulf war. They should have UNIRONICALLY taken Kiev in 3 days. The amazing thing is that it WASN'T like that. They failed their initial maneuveral operations/initiatives, and had to SETTLE on the attritional style. That was a win for the AFU, right off the bat. Ukraine even getting to still have a country is a win. Look into what Ukraine had for air power compared to Russia, for instance. They just got their first, and only, radar plane this year. They have no strategic bombers, no aircraft from this millennium. Every thing they has was old soviet stuff, that Russia has better of. They are out manned and out gunned at every turn. This is why it's hilarious that russia shills act like russia is doing some amazing thing by eating shit for 4 years, and gaining an additional 1% of Ukraine's territory, while self suiciding demographically.
The question is stupid anyways. Russia is in fact continually marginally advancing, but they are massively advantaged in every way. They should have already won. It should have been like when we beat Iraq in the first gulf war. They should have UNIRONICALLY taken Kiev in 3 days. The amazing thing is that it WASN'T like that. They failed their initial maneuveral operations/initiatives, and had to SETTLE on the attritional style. That was a win for the AFU, right off the bat. Ukraine even getting to still have a country is a win. Look into what Ukraine had for air power compared to Russia, for instance. They just got their first, and only, radar plane this year. They have no strategic bombers, no aircraft from this millennium. Every thing they has was old soviet stuff, that Russia has better of. They are out manned and out gunned at every turn. This is why it's hilarious that russia shills act like russia is doing some amazing thing by eating shit for 4 years, and gaining an additional 1% of Ukraine's territory, while self suiciding demographically.
>>514751867
So is that
>Russia and NK are taking on NATO alone
Where are the NATO allied air craft? The AFU has exactly ONE radar plane. They don't have a single air craft from this millennia. They have cold war era soviet planes, and some early 90s F 16s and mirages. They have 0 strategic bombers. They are out gunned and out manned at every turn. And you idiots somehow turn that into Russia
> taking on NATO alone
Get fucking real.
>>514751999
No, see vid here
https://files.catbox.moe/2bex2b.mp4
The AFU were allowed to ectract. Trump and Putin coordinated it, after Trump cut intelligence.. Russia couldn't have removed
them by force, get real.
Neat. So what NATO units are fighting with the AFU? There aren't any. It's literally just the AFU. And here's their handy work
>just a sample of what that PR stunt towards Pokrovsk cost russia.
https://files.catbox.moe/abdadl.mp4
So is that
>Russia and NK are taking on NATO alone
Where are the NATO allied air craft? The AFU has exactly ONE radar plane. They don't have a single air craft from this millennia. They have cold war era soviet planes, and some early 90s F 16s and mirages. They have 0 strategic bombers. They are out gunned and out manned at every turn. And you idiots somehow turn that into Russia
> taking on NATO alone
Get fucking real.
>>514751999
No, see vid here
https://files.catbox.moe/2bex2b.mp4
The AFU were allowed to ectract. Trump and Putin coordinated it, after Trump cut intelligence.. Russia couldn't have removed
them by force, get real.
Neat. So what NATO units are fighting with the AFU? There aren't any. It's literally just the AFU. And here's their handy work
>just a sample of what that PR stunt towards Pokrovsk cost russia.
https://files.catbox.moe/abdadl.mp4
>>513204807
>elaborate cope
How is that "break through" in the pokrovsk direction going?
>>513205112
As they should be (picrel). Russia is advantaged in every possible way. Ukraine wasn't some great power before this. In fact, it should have literally been 3 days until Kiev. The fact that they are still eating shit, going nowhere after 4 years, and have decimated their demographic of fighting age men, irreparably, even as foreigners flood into Moscow, at a record pace, could be called a loss in it's own right. They will never reach Kiev, and there WILL always be a Ukrainian state, and now, NATO is on the Russian border, with 20 plus new bases in Finland.
>elaborate cope
How is that "break through" in the pokrovsk direction going?
>>513205112
As they should be (picrel). Russia is advantaged in every possible way. Ukraine wasn't some great power before this. In fact, it should have literally been 3 days until Kiev. The fact that they are still eating shit, going nowhere after 4 years, and have decimated their demographic of fighting age men, irreparably, even as foreigners flood into Moscow, at a record pace, could be called a loss in it's own right. They will never reach Kiev, and there WILL always be a Ukrainian state, and now, NATO is on the Russian border, with 20 plus new bases in Finland.
>>513144870
The russian army/military is/are garbage. All of the advantages, and they still go nowhere.
The russian army/military is/are garbage. All of the advantages, and they still go nowhere.
>>512463828
They didn't lose in terms of battles. They didn't fight some trench warfare like is being fought now. Anytime anything got hot, they just called in close air support, and demolished anything in the area of where the enemy was. The reason they "lost", is the same reason russia did. because it was an expeditionary war. Look at the logistics of fighting a war on the other side of the world. Nobody else can, or does that. Russia is fighting Ukraine with the most favorable logistics possible. They are contiguous with them. That is what makes Ukraine's success so impressive. Russia is advantaged in every way against them.
They didn't lose in terms of battles. They didn't fight some trench warfare like is being fought now. Anytime anything got hot, they just called in close air support, and demolished anything in the area of where the enemy was. The reason they "lost", is the same reason russia did. because it was an expeditionary war. Look at the logistics of fighting a war on the other side of the world. Nobody else can, or does that. Russia is fighting Ukraine with the most favorable logistics possible. They are contiguous with them. That is what makes Ukraine's success so impressive. Russia is advantaged in every way against them.
>>509195822
There is a massive asymmetric advantage that the muscovites have. You'll be rejected as a silly person if you just act as if Russia and the AFU started as equals. This asymmetry MUST be taken into account, when ascertaining the situation, pound for pound.
Extricate your self from posting on the internet, further.
GLORY TO THE HEROES. GLORY TO UKRAINE. GLORY, NOT, TO THE MOSCOVITES.
There is a massive asymmetric advantage that the muscovites have. You'll be rejected as a silly person if you just act as if Russia and the AFU started as equals. This asymmetry MUST be taken into account, when ascertaining the situation, pound for pound.
Extricate your self from posting on the internet, further.
GLORY TO THE HEROES. GLORY TO UKRAINE. GLORY, NOT, TO THE MOSCOVITES.