>>718779265
>but it might still be good
I won't get my hopes up, anon. Considering it's getting The Chinese Room treatment. It'll be a feeble attempt at a VtM game with tryhard mechanics that will attempt to appeal to the original audience without knowing what made it work in the first place, or having the dev experience or knowledge to implement it correctly. At worst it'll be a vampire walking simulator with tacked-on, weak, combat mechanic which is appearent from the videos of the gameplay that were released already imo. Also, the hands are too close to eachother making the first-person pov look weird and off focus, am I the only one who sees it? Don't get me wrong, I want it to be good or at least avarage, doing it's own thing, but past experience with that studio says it'll flop and under-deliver on its gameplay and storytelling ability; it's a very ambitious project for that studio to undertake considering their proven abilities and knowledge in game design already. At least we've got the original; that is good enough for me. And if the new one will be at least a 6 or a 7 out of 10 like Outer Worlds was, I'll be content with it. But again, don't get your hopes up.
