>>106619668
>But now I feel kinda discouraged, again, as itll simply be seen as a replacement for women, which is not my intention.

i don't give a shit about sexist stuff i just want to have a physical relationship with a mechanical being in a way that i simply cannot with my desktop computer or automobile. the robot is only in the shape of a human female because i'm a human male and that's just how we fit together. it doesn't matter to me if love comes from programming or actual attraction, the point is to share life with another being that uniquely has no preconceived notions about the world but is lightyears smarter than i could ever be.

>>28585905
i don't catch any flak posting naked machines on the sexy machine board thoughbeit, except from jealous nogens like you
meanwhile you're just a hateful pedophile who wants to force his dirty illegal fetish down everyone's throat
your flesh is weak, like your mind.

>>11359728
She looks the same as she always did, but is still a different person. Be careful.

>>11360039
I find the existential "what am I!?" stuff kinda quaint. It's not like humans don't grapple with the same questions.
Robots may be built with specific purposes in mind, but that stops mattering once they achieve independence. Then your purpose is whatever you choose it to be, just like everybody else.

>when you're forced to enter debug mode or follow directions.
Probably like nothing. Not like they'd be conscious for it.