Only a hundred years ago before gay was mainstreamed most same sex attracted men had wives and children because being unmarried without children was considered shameful.

Do we really want to re-litigate the idea of "no true straight man would..." because it goes both ways.

Because if no true straight man would be with a guy, then no true gay man could be with a female.

tf am I arguing logic in a gay thread for.

Reminder that for all the bullshit gays try to gaslight straights with about love as their public image, and for all the gay music performers in 2025, you still cant think of one song by gays for gays actually about love.

But your gay boomers can crank out a new "coming of age" film every week with not one original theme but always sure to show some teenage boys kissing until its a chore to find a gay film about anything else.

Heres some movie concepts:

Snakes taking over an airplane
A tornado that dumps sharks into a flooded town
A virus escapes and turns the world into a zombie apocalypse
A young monogamous gay couple meet and remain together their whole lives

Now guess which one is so unbelievable that even Hollywood wont write a script for it.

Theres your "pride".

>>40490603
Well you had four good legal years and three as a minor as a white gay. I don't know what else you were expecting.

"Exoletus is a Latin term, the perfect passive participle of the verb exolescere, which means "to wear out with age". In ancient Rome the word referred to a certain class of homosexual males or male prostitutes, although its precise meaning is unclear to historians."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exoletus