>>514840646
Because troons are obviously unstable and its a hot button issue thanks to troons being obviously unstable. Really this is to push national dialogue towards mental health being the problem and not firearms ownership with a lighting rod demographic. Should be fun.
>>514841217
>The Supreme Court won't allow it anyway.
It could go either way. But first the rule would need to be implemented by the administrative state with a notice and comment period before it winds its way though the administrative law process. It will be a ban on sale by the ATF and the DOJ will figure out some scheme to enforce it. The death of Chevron makes appealing this much easier but it will take years before it goes up to the Court. Thanks to the recent ruling on injunctions it will be the law de facto for that time. You could make the argument it is an ex post facto law which could speed things up but that is doubtful.
>A categorical ban of gun rights without due process is not going to fly with them.
The Court changed the commerce clause and radically altered the role of government in your day to day life to an extreme degree over less in the 1940s.
