>>514827419
You can describe the Roman Empire as socialism. Socialism is Latin for sharing.
>>514830360
>It's communism and fascism that has an extremely blurred definition because both were movements against the same issues, presenting virtually the same solution, often led by the same people (many socialists became fascists, and vice-versa).
Not even remotely the same. Fascism is a society reliant on merit and the common good. Communism is a society based on materialism and redistributing the wealth. The only thing socialist and capitalists don't agree on is who should hold that wealth. But fundamentally both are based on vain materialism

It's also not correct to say NS is unique as both Fascism and NS inevitably draw from the same well - the Roman Empire.

He transformed a third world favela country into a functioning one. If the people want to keep electing him, what's the problem?
>DON'T YOU KNOW GOY, YOU HAVE TO HAVE FAKE ELECTIONS FUNDED BY SHEKELERING PUPPETERS IN HICH YOU GET TO PICK #GOY 1 OR GOY #2

In the sacred words of uncle Adolf: "What does democracy or authoritarian state mean to these international hyenas? They don't care at all. They are only interested in one thing. Are you willing to be plundered? Yes or no?! Are you stupid enough to keep quiet in the process? Yes or no?! And, when a democracy is stupid enough not to stand up, then it is good. But when an authoritative state declares: "You don't plunder our people any longer... neither from the inside or the outside", then that is bad"

>>510388078
>MUH MONEY

>>509066630
>nooooo i will continue thinking like an animal
I accept your concession, subhuman. Keep failing while avoiding the one thing that generates these institutions.

>kikes killed my Caesaropapist Tsar with pizduli