>>107105507
I still can't get over how Wikipedia banned its biggest editor who created the most articles and before he bounced he left a message on his talk page admitting to deliberately adding factual errors and copyright violations across his entire 1.5 million edits on the website.
>About a year after joining the project, I started creating articles. Some early creations from 2007 got tagged as [copyright violations]. A year later, they were still being tagged. I got added to some white-list at the time, and avoided adding OBVIOUS [copyright violations] and further scrutiny, but made no attempt to either stop or remove the ones I added. Guess what - that continued since then. Not just across the 93,000+ articles I created, but across the 1.5 million edits I made too. Tens of thousands (a low-end estimate) now have these issues. Have a look at any film article from before 1930, for example. And that's before I mention the countless deliberate errors on pages that have very few pages views. Was that person born on 21 June, or was it 12 June?
>So that moral obligation? Ha. Good luck with that. "The mess" is now your mess and the burden falls with YOU to fix it. Enjoy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lugnuts/Archive_61#Outgoing