>>41020171
To the Moors slavery wasn't about race. It was just part of their society and existed in the area before they came, and the Moors set up their own "rules" for it. The Moorish slave trade resembled Americas more than people know, the Irish were bought and sold as slaves in America and freedmen could and did own slaves. White slave owners sold black slaves to freed blacks all the time. The KKK even has its own doctrine about inner-racial hierarchy.

Where I was going by pointing out the Moorish slave trade is that in the Evolian caste system, which he modeled after the Indo-European caste system in India, what Sufis call the Al-Insan Al-Kamils run society as the priest caste. The Brahmans, the Druids, etc. and the lowest, the manual labor class, are those that are spiritually destitute.

>>514697050
>Useless history
Nigger the burnt offerings described in the Vedas are the ones from the Old Testament.
>>514698093
Have you ever seen "The Birth of a Nation?" It makes a good case relevant to what you said.
Slavery is a complicated subject, in some cases they're better off that way, but on the other hand if it gets out of control it can destroy nations. When slavery ended they should've all been shipped out of the U.S., it was a mistake to keep them here as freemen.
Without the institution of slavery that caste system forms itself by nature on its own within multiple races. In ancient times shamans led their tribes all over the world.

So I notice a lot of bigots, like racists, transphobes/homophobes, etc., try to use the specter of rape when they're trying to convince you to hate whatever group of people they hate.

But I notice one group who has trouble doing this is misogynists. Why are woman haters incapable of conjuring up the specter of rape as a great threat the same way that racists and transphobes are?