Search results for "85d5dd0d2d345c40d84a915aabee4a67" in md5 (4)

/pol/ - Thread 515063124
Anonymous United States No.515064886
>>515063124
Rich coming from the leader of an insectoid society whos entire reason for existence is to mine rare earth minerals for our reptilian overlords and pump out cheap products for the rich western demon people who developed them
/pol/ - It's Over
Anonymous United Kingdom No.514722943
>>514722529
have an ocean between you and them.
don't let them land on american soil.
any kind of mass mobilization would be visible from space.
the bigger threat is from the chinese already in your borders
/vst/ - /aoeg/ - Age of Empires General
Anonymous No.2103644
>>2103624
The CCP acknowledges that there was a tibetan empire that opposed china historically, and, through the dynasties since and various other acts of submission, the CCP claims they are part of the modern state. The CCP still recognizes Tibetans as a distinctly different people than the Han Chinese
Games like Crusader Kings and Hearts of Iron have not been banned in China for portraying Tibet as independent
/int/ - Thread 211627099
Anonymous Peru No.211628540
Canada is more ethnically homogeneous than China, hans and anglos (and french) both replaced their ethnic native populations, difference is that China has been culturally assimilating them for millennia, while you came to bitch here after the first time you saw a non-native indian

Also, that graph is from the World Inequality Database, the formula is

>[Net personal wealth]=[Personal non-financial assets]+[Personal financial assets]-[Personal debt]

First, it doesn't mean "the bottom half of China on average holds twice as much wealth..." but NET wealth, you can hold more net wealth than a multimillionaire or even a billionaire if he is overleveraged, it's common sense that you're not really better off than him, it's the same for countries.

Secondly, it means the average bottom 50% of usonian is, on average, a net creditor after paying off their rent and mortgage.

Third, that is a PPP (purchasing power parity) value, nominal (market) value, from the same source and year, is the same for both $4800

https://wid.world/share/#0/countriestimeseries/ahweal_p0p50_z/US;CN/2019/us/k/x/yearly/a/false/-4297.1145/8000/curve/false