>>513123809
tianamen square was chinas little rock...
>>513122616
I have watched all his videos because of his alien and novel perspective with extensive factual recall. Very interesting and stimulating exercise to see where he editorializes and spins things.
His pet theories and a combination of geographic with spiritual determinism are retarded.

One video has been banned and its the german one this alone shows the foundation of our political formula.

He is partial to the vikings, greece, the french revolution (mostly framed as meritocratic accelerant but I suspect its the CCP and communism)
Königsberg was insignificant for german culture and scientific prowess he is silly on that.
Total indifference to islam.

Ambivalent Rome.

Hates mongols, chinese buerocrats and modern america.

Thats a CCP conform class nearly as I saw the sum total outside some of his passions.
No mention of Goethe and Luther. Shows a broadly communist not western view of the world in my opinion. But maybe unnecessary since the class was about
the genesis of pax americana.

people against the covid lockdown and stolen election?
>nick fuentes
not against it or neutral
>tucker, vance, musk, candace

being on the right side of the important issues means that you are a bad actor how
convenient and the perfect defense for those who were in the wrong

>>511223046
we really do not know how nazi germany would have run in peacetime and longterm
even if he correctly and in good faith points out structural faults or inefficiencies we can only speculate
most economies do and did run on debt, future expectations are normal how they tallied against the benefits over time is hard to say

it seems bad faith if we compare it to modern china or wallstreet, nothing works without what he would describe as "fraud"

nazi germany was an industrial juggernaut, it did work extremely well and trying to deny it is pure ideological revisionism
its peter zeihan and jared diamond coded to say national socialism does not work

hint rhineland capitalism worked in postwar germany too and the difference to national socialism is not that extreme
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_market_economy

he is doing the communist tactic of deconstruction a relentless one sided attack, ayn rand tried to create objectivism to counter it without invoking tradition, ethnos or christ (she failed)

he has not proffered how nazi germany stacks up against the fraud of the everything bubble in the US, the british empire which had the highest GPD in the world but hardy any state income or the chinese realestate market all of which might provide structural positive trade offs