opinions on the use of the word 'clanker' ?

i think it's wrong because robots will have feelings soon

>>96234594
This is patently false, I've had shit decks that went up to 6 and I've had decks with 5 synergistic rares go 2.
Growing in skill brings up your average, but the idea that you won't have low lows is almost as retarded as you are.

Sack the casting director

>>714096103
He's the one that needs to let it go since he's the one still responding to, talking about and being inflammatory over it yet he can't because he has terminal foot in mouth disease wrapped in narcissism and a victim complex.

Obligatory "I'm leaving" post, I will be back August 1. Until then, ganbatte