>>280095524
>Factually these pictures exist and weren't considered "gay" at the time.
This absolutism is what makes anything you say seem like bullshit.
All you have is some image and stretching the meaning of that as an evidence of "it was not seen as gay" and the same time you give yourself the right to speak in behalf of all people in the past.
This was about girls handholding and the few evidence i have found doesn't portray it as common in the past. I don't know why you can be mad if someone say something like "gay moment", i never meant the characters are gay. Just was pointing out something ambiguous.