>>536866029
my totally original and never before said take is that toby fox did not remove a single sexual assault allegory. "she was used up", the notion of kris forcing her to do things and noelle blacks out and is in denial that it happened, the weird route beginning with a wedding ring that kris forced on to noelle that hurts her, kris making all the decisions for her, it's classic husband assaulting wife shit and if toby got "spooked" by online backlash then the entire weird route would be scrapped. but it isn't. so riddle me this joker, what puritanism happened when he removed the flower imagery but still kept the entire fucking scene where kris forces something onto noelle and "shatters" her?
another point: deflowering imagery is too on the nose
