Christianity and Evolution don't even have to be mutually exclusive things anyways. One of the pioneers of evolutionary biology and a prominent 19th century paleontologist William Buckland himself was a theologian and a Dean at Westminster Abbey. But much like how Charles Darwin himself had initially studied to be a Anglican Cleric, they were both forced to revise their views of Biblical Literalism when faced with evidence regarding geology and biology than contradicted reality. Neither set out to disprove God, quite the opposite, they were both highly religious, Darwin would even quote Bible passages daily whilst onboard the HMS Beagle. The point is that you can still believe in God while being critical of how the Bible itself is interpreted with regards to real life claims.

>>17971390
It's not that simple anon. Judaism before the 1st century certainly existed and early Christians would've called themselves followers of Jewish religious customs, but there is a difference between Judaism as a folk religion and Judaism as it emerged around the 1st-3rd centuries, and Chuds love to abuse this ambiguity to claim that modern Jews aren't the same as old Jews or what Christianity was not really Jewish, which is obviously not true. Rabbinic Judaism and Christianity both come from Judean Folk religious tradition. Religious Reformist in the 1st-3rd Centuries just took different approaches when it comes to compiling and codifying the body of oral and written works of ancient Jews into what we now call the Torah or Old Testament. The Christian approach was to Canonize the Old Testament but revise it with a New Testament that attempts to supplement it while Rabbinic Jews attempted to clarify the Torah through debate and open dialogue with the Talmud acting as a sort of legal reference based on the opinions of various rabbis. Gnosticism was another group that was part of the same movement.