>>514935865
Critics might argue the Titanic theory lacks hard evidence, such as logs or eyewitness accounts of sabotage, and that Epstein’s crimes were individual rather than institutional. However, a steel-man response would highlight the difficulty of uncovering such evidence due to the passage of time and the power of those involved to suppress it. The Federal Reserve’s creation benefited Morgan’s interests, as did Epstein’s activities benefiting certain elites, suggesting a recurring strategy of control through crisis or compromise. While the link is circumstantial, the pattern of J.P. Morgan’s influence—spanning shipping disasters, banking monopolies, and financial misconduct—offers a coherent narrative of a thread connecting these events, rooted in the pursuit of power by a single financial lineage.
This argument strengthens the theory by acknowledging historical facts (Morgan’s IMM ownership, Epstein’s bank accounts), addressing counterpoints (lack of direct evidence), and proposing a plausible motive (elite control), while remaining grounded in the available context.
