>>536749901
>I was describing Amy the same way she is described in the GAME canon by Sonic Team, and on Sonic Channel, and in the Sonic CD manual.
The manuals are marketing fluff. The game canon is what's in the game. If the marketing material contradicts the games, precedence is given to the games. Her opening monologue in SA1 is her complaining she's bored because she can't stalk Sonic anymore. Her "dislike of boredom" is explicitly tied to her romantic obsession, not a genuine desire for adventure.
>Sonic X didn't "sanitize" her at all, they overexaggerated the energy but flanderized it into aggression
It sanitized her core motivation. It removed the possessive, creepy stalker elements from her and replaced them with generic tsundere hammer gags. It's a different kind of shit character, but it's still not the game character. You're defending a cartoon that misunderstood the entire cast. Which is funny since you started off by pretending you weren't just another coping xfag.
>Amy was always intended to be Sonic's genuine love interest. Their chase dynamic is built on that, it's meant to be "MORE INTERESTING"
It's not a "dynamic". It's one-sided harassment. Sonic spends the entire series running away from her. An "unconventional romance" is not one person sexually harassing another for decades. That's a crime. The only thing "interesting" is why they keep a character whose entire premise is to be a narrative jobber who fails at her only goal.
>That is nothing but a blatant lie you're telling. You're actively throwing Amy's entire character away, and rewriting it entirely just to hate on her.
I'm not rewriting a thing. You're the one throwing away the actual canon to defend some OOC version of the character that exists only in your head, in marketing material, and in a poorly written TV show. The game character is a creepy pink stalker, Sparky. When will you learn? Amy was never good. She is an anchor for the wind. Cut from the same cloth as Sally Acorn.
