>>716166695
It definitely does feel like autism to get angry over slightly older games being discussed. The definition of retro is: imitative of a style, fashion, or design from the recent past.
What constitutes the distant past? I'd argue that fits games up to 2015 at least. We can nitpick when gaming lost it's "soul" or uniqueness but games of the 7th gen had a unique style that feels retro by today's standards. As for /vr/ the board itself seems funny enough... stuck in the past with older millennials, gen x'ers, and boomers desperately seeking validation. They have to gatekeep in order to convince themselves that their precious NES games (which lets be honest were mostly shit) are worthy of being talked about in current year over anything else.