>>719708564
You could say the buying crowd is diminishing because the perception of value and said quality of 80 dollar games is non-existent, because if the triple A games have sucked at 70 dollars, what would make consumers even think that 80 dollars would be fair for a asking price? I certainly won't be buying 80 dollar games, and even when it came to 70 I've been very selective compares to how it's been back when it was 50/60.

>>717085759
Can't say I really am, the last one was a positive surprise after Ubisoft not knowing where to take the franchise for like two entries, but dunno. I kinda feel like I've played all the settings I could have ever liked, and I've played every game in the franchise growing up minus 1503. Rome to me just really isn't the type of setting I'm very interested in.